Archive for August, 2007

Filed Under (One Dayers, Team Selection, India) by Abhinav Kaiser on August-28-2007

Robin UthappaWatching the proceedings at Edgbaston where India got edged out in a familiar fashion, it calls for some changes in the batting line up. I would start right at the top with the one down position. Karthik was brilliant in the test series and showed promise in the first one dayer where he played low down; but, he is not apt for the crucial No.3 slot. We need somebody with experience at that position. As Dravid has taken on the responsibility of steadying and stabilizing the lower order, the only other man fit for that position would be Tendulkar. He has the experience and grit to carry out the job that Ian Bell has been doing for England in this series. Tendulkar needs to drop to No.3 position in the best interest of the team.

Taking Tendulkar out of the opening slot would enable Uthappa to walk in seamlessly. Uthappa is an exciting player, entertaining to watch and a great prospect for the future. He has the tenacity to murder bowlers in a Gilchrist fashion. He will surely up the ante by providing some quick starts which has been lacking so far from India.

Another change that I would recommend is going back to the four bowler formula. We don’t have a dependable batting line anymore. We need more batsmen to compensate for our shortcomings. Powar has played well but his nonathletic fielding, spilling catches and no-contact batting should be taken into consideration and dropped to make way for the debutant Rohit Sharma. India can manage with the guile of Tendulkar and the accuracy of Yuvraj for the fifth bowler’s slot. Having just four bowlers will put more responsibility on other regular bowlers and that’s how it should be.



Filed Under (BCCI, ICL, India) by Abhinav Kaiser on August-25-2007

ICLSubhash Chandra announced the formation of the Indian Cricket League mainly to make money from the cricket crazy Indian public. He hoped that BCCI would support him in his venture and take a share of the earnings as well. But, the money hungry board that single handedly rules over any cricket activity in India was not ready to part a piece of it’s pie. The great Indian cricket tussle had begun.

BCCI never felt that ICL would be able to kick off as they maintained their authority over all cricket stadiums and domestic cricketers who aspired to play for the country. They even made fun of ICL when retired players started signing up with lucrative deals. BCCI had the biggest shock of the century when several domestic players started signing up for the league despite life ban threat. The sleeping giant had woken up to the biggest Indian migration since the partition of India and Pakistan. This kind of switchover is not found in the political circles as well.

BCCIBCCI had to do something really quick, or the cards were turning square. They put together a great format for Twenty20 which involved other countries and a professional firm like IMG. They called it Professional Cricket League. There would be some foreign cricketers presence in this BCCI league which should add color(literally) and variety to the cricket played. The same professionalism and quality will gradually be moved over to the domestic ODIs and test matches to be played.

It does not matter whether BCCI wins this battle or ICL manages to squeak in the glory; the obvious winner is Indian cricket. BCCI had done nothing to the game but to update their personal passbooks. Money that came from the game was not spent for the game which is ideal scenario but was used for personal satisfaction. Finally, we can see a small fraction of the BCCI money spent on cricket. It has already announced 200 crores for training facilities.

Kudos to ICL for initiating a revolution in Indian cricket history. There is no doubt on my mind that Subhash Chandra is set to face the biggest loss of his business life through ICL but he has done a great favor which should be recorded in the history books.



Filed Under (BCCI, ICL) by Abhinav Kaiser on August-18-2007

ICL BossThe reports regarding 8 Hyderabad players who aligned with ICL would have come as a jolt for the BCCI. Not all those who signed up for the rebel league are ageing stars, the list includes future Indian team probables as well. There are several other reports making rounds regarding several other young promising stars waiting to sign up for ICL.

Young Indian cricketers joining the league is a good omen for India. Initially I was worried regarding the Indian representation that the league could get obtain as the BCCI had clearly stated that the players who are involved with ICL will be banned for life. Now, the inflow is rich with youth and talent. BCCI would not like to lose such talent who could be an asset to the national team. BCCI will have to compromise by allowing ICL players to play in the official national tournaments as well. I hope more and more young players join ICL.

Imagine this! India lose Twenty20 World Cup in the initial rounds. In the ICL tournament, some young stars perform excellently by scoring tons of runs against quality opposition. If the public supports the performing players at ICL, BCCI would be left with no choice but to join hands with ICL.

Lets wait and watch as the drama unfolds…



Filed Under (Strategy, India, England, Test Matches) by Abhinav Kaiser on August-8-2007

OvalIndia leading a test series outside India with one test to go is a rare matter. But when it happens once in a blue moon, the situations should be taken seriously and dealt with duly. On Thursday, India play England at the Oval hoping to wrap up the series in style. England on the other hand have no intentions of losing this war. England have not lost any of their home series since the Ashes loss in 2001. A draw in this test or a loss at worse would be an embarrassing one.

India should go positively into this match with no changes to their XI from the last test. The current side looks balanced and have tasted victory before. The batting trio of Dravid, Tendulkar and Ganguly should hold fort against the English bowling. Openers have been impressive and Laxman has been erratic more than once. Recharged Zaheer backed by RP Singh should provide optimum seaming options. Sreesanth who has great potential should get another chance to prove his critics right. Kumble, the lone spinning ranger is quite adept at taking on the opposition single handedly although England has not been a happy hunting ground for him.

England is boosted by the return of Pietersen. His presence adds greatly to the team’s morale. The spinner friendly wicket at the Oval should excite Panesar and maybe Vaughn could chip in a bit. But, the England batting looks shaky and unstable. Bell, Collingwood, Cook and Prior haven’t delivered in the first two test matches and look out of sorts. Bowling looks healthy with swinging options of Sidebottom and bouncy Tremlett. Anderson has looked weak with his out swingers and this test could be his chance for redemption.

On the Indian standpoint, India should be aggressive and look to win the test match rather than a stalemate. Bowlers shouldn’t lose their concentration and should continue where they left off at Trentbridge. Sreesanth will have to put the last test behind and concentrate on hitting the target consistently. India is not an aggressive team in the test matches as they fail to score runs in a hurry. They are always content on accumulating runs than going after the bowlers. Strategy should change in this test match and the matches to come in the future. The batsmen starting with the openers should look to score runs from ball one.

On the English standpoint, they need to bat well; really well. It is their batting that has let them down on all occasions. Bowlers have looked positive and effective. If the English batsmen can come good, there is a good chance of them leveling the series and saving their pride.

The Oval test has all the ingredients to become a historical test match. It is left to the people who matter the most on the field to act out according to the script. This blockbuster should be won with heart and grit to be deemed a great success.



Filed Under (Twenty20, Team Selection, England) by Abhinav Kaiser on August-6-2007

Paul Collingwood (Durham, capt)
Ravi Bopara (Essex)
Stuart Broad (Leicestershire)
Andrew Flintoff (Lancashire)
James Kirtley (Sussex)
Darren Maddy (Warwickshire)
Kevin Pietersen (Hampshire)
Matt Prior (Sussex, wkt)
Chris Schofield (Surrey)
Owais Shah (Middlesex)
Ryan Sidebottom (Nottinghamshire)
Jeremy Snape (Leicestershire)
Vikram Solanki (Worcestershire)
Chris Tremlett (Hampshire)
Luke Wright (Sussex)

More details to follow…



Filed Under (India) by Abhinav Kaiser on August-3-2007

Sharad PawarWhile India seems to be doing fine with no specialist big name coach, BCCI president Sharad Pawar has quoted that a new big profile coach will be selected for team India in less than a month. He said this while addressing the members of KSCA at Bangalore. BCCI feels that it’s top priority would be to find a foreign coach and they have duly sent mails for recommendations to Australia, England, West Indies and New Zealand.

India needs a brilliant strategist than a coach who can teach Dravid on cover drives. Ravi Shastri fitted into the mold perfectly but his contractual stipulations kept him out of Indian cricket. Pawar and party should try and find a strategist in India or abroad who has a great knowledge about the modern game.